LED light source in the future is uncertain stalemate
The parliament of Taichung City Taiwan area not long ago decided after reviewbudget, 79000000 LED grants will delete the news caused concern. Senator Li Zhong said, LED street lamp illumination is insufficient, the failure rate is very high, even after the repair fee subsidies to install streetlights, did not achieve the purpose of saving money.
Coincidentally, Guangdong three years pushed public lighting recently been strongly questioned, that the industry, regional exchanges of LED lighting products technology is not mature, science and technology content is not high people can not doubt. The bigger question is, LED lighting products need to consume large amount of non-ferrous metal resources, does not meet the national energy saving low carbon policy.The application of LED in public lighting has certain risk.
Re thinking on how to develop the LED lighting industry should be an uncertain future
After the first few years of the carnival, LED lighting industry sequela constantly emerge, the shuffle period will last to 2014 metaphase. If the market environment is not to see the LED lighting company, is likely to repeat the mistakes of photovoltaicindustry.
Temporarily between, LED light source has been valued by government and industryinto an uncertain future deadlock. At the same time, from another point of view, the chaos after the industry began to future development direction of calm and think of LED light source.
Beware of "good intentions"
Recently, the Shanghai people said, LED lighting has been the government's eyes"xiangbobo" in Shanghai, the LED upstream chip enterprises are giving huge subsidies. However, since the beginning of this year, the subsidized enterprises did not obtain any result, the sources said Shanghai began to inhibit the development of LED lighting. In 2009, Jiangsu province Yangzhou City Hall launched MOCVD subsidy policy, the Chinese other local governments have to follow, but at the beginning of last year, Yangzhou will stop MOCVD allowance policy, all MOCVD subsidies graduallystop. Obviously, if the person that Shanghai will begin to inhibition of LED light source development, then it is very likely a microcosm of LED light source in the nationaldevelopment, governments or planning for the LED source development also gradually return to rational.
LED development up to now, the policy subsidies one by one, from upstream todownstream application Goods are available in all varieties. equipment procurement.However, how many companies really is blunt to R & D, for the expansion, tocontribute to the development of the industry, rather than as "pocket money" you spend? If subsidies in place, the enterprise development has no effect, the government should take measures to save? Whether they need to take legal programaccountability? Or that people's hard-earned money lost can not be? In addition, a huge fiscal subsidy policy was terminated, subsidized enterprises will face what kind ofsituation? This in turn to the industry caused what influence? These are important issues for further consideration.